Miyerkules, Hulyo 13, 2011

I am Anti-RH Bill

I am anti-RH Bill not because I want to be different but because this is what I personally feel is right.

Back in La Salle, sex education was taught to us as early as Fifth Grade. Actually, I vaguely remember them teaching this to us back in Grade 3 but details went down when in 5th grade.

Anyway, it did not in any way affect our moral values as Christian/Catholics or whatever religion/belief we have. It did not awaken any sexual urge. 


We were just kids for crying out loud!


Based on observation, almost all my classmates back in elementary don't have kids of their own yet. 

I believe being educated with sex education at a young age won’t affect a kid’s moral. Students are aware that whatever is being taught to them is for educational purpose only. I, for one, did not even know that it was ‘Sex Education’ until now, when everyone started creating such fuzz about it. Why the need to create a name? It can simply be an exploration of the reproductive system.

Children are innocent. It is not wise to corrupt their innocence or feed unnecessary and/or untimely wisdom to them.

The RH Bill contradicts itself in ways that cannot be seen.

We should focus on creating a more firm law. We can provide education and free contraceptives without passing this RH Bill.

Walang komento:

Mag-post ng isang Komento